I personally think talk shows have worn out their welcome. I’m a old head and remember Phil Donahue, which means we have been bombarded with talk shows for over 40 years. Out of all the talk shows, that have made it onto the airwaves, only two folks have made a mark. The mentioned Donahue, and of course, Oprah Winfrey. Everyone else has been blah and usually forgettable.
So, when I saw the promo for the new talk show “The Real,” I was only mildly curious. I decided to watch a few clips from the show, because all of the hosts are women of color. It’s the one unique thing about this tired format. I hoped because they were women of color, they would bring something new to the game. But alas, they are out of touch, just like the rest of them.
It’s probably because they are all rich (or at least well off) women of color. I had three problems with the show: (1) They all look-alike. They all have the standard homogeneous look that is required of women of color celebrities, these days. (2) It was annoying to see the full-figured black woman (yet again) shoving food down her throat/self-depreciating humor. Don’t we get enough of those images of black women in mainstream media? (3) they claimed that there will be one person on the show we (the common woman) will be able to connect to, I didn’t relate to any of the women. Ugh. If you can stomach it, the show has a four-week test run starting on July 15th…
A few years ago, the TV show Without a Trace, aired an episode about two missing teenagers. One was black, the other white….The episode showed how the media, community searches, and law enforcement tend to focus more on disappearances of non-children of color. At the end of the show, one of the teenager’s body is found. The screen fades out and credits roll. The point of the ending was that it didn’t matter whose body was found, the death of either teenager should be mourned by all. It was a bold move for a mainstream television show.
The film-in-progress “Muted” examines this lack of attention to missing children of color. The tears of mothers of color aren’t taken as seriously as white mothers. The directors have started a Kickstarter campaign. Please support them, if you can:
Muted follows Lena Gladwell, a mother whose world is shattered when her teenage daughter Crystal disappears. Springing into action, Lena attempts to enlist the help of the press and the police. Expecting the full support of law enforcement and local media, Lena quickly learns the painful and tragic lesson that all missing persons are not created equal.
I’m not this skin, I am the soul that lives within”–India.aire
I’ve been natural for almost 5 years. I sometimes alternate between sporting a short fro, braids, wigs, etc., but I’m mostly a natural girl. It’s hard being a natural-haired black woman. Despite a growing movement, natural hair is still seen as an anomaly. Especially, when one lives in white dominated cities. Unlike other hairstyles, natural hair is not respected/affirmed in mainstream OR black media. Heck ( if anything), visibly looking black women have been slowly removed from the media. If you are not ambiguous looking (being a light skin black woman is even becoming passé), you get no shine. So, for the natural haired black woman, you are especially invisible.
BUT…you are also more visible at the same time. By this I mean folks become extra zeroed in on your hair. Folks tend to think they have a right to black women’s bodies, because of our society’s racist/sexist history. They think they have a right to get into our personal space and ask us a thousand questions about our hair. Some even feel they have a right to touch it!
I personally have a no explaining about hair rule to non-black people. It’s tiring, and folks really don’t care. It’s just another way to gawk at black women, since many think we are some different species. So, I can’t understand why a black woman would willingly let a non-black person paw at their hair. It’s unimaginable to me, but some folks are doing it.
an interactive public art exhibit, dubbed You Can Touch My Hair, where strangers from all walks of life will have the welcomed opportunity to touch various textures of black
Say what! They so crazy! You couldn’t pay me a million dollars to do some mess like that. It just seems wrong to me. Black folks can’t spend our lives educating non-black folks, this is another form of oppression. How many years have folks been living side by side us, and they still don’t know 101 things about our culture. It ain’t our responsibility. This event should be cancelled. But some folks gotta learn the hard way
Funny, the other day I was watching a movie with Pam Grier (it was actually an early 2000’s film and she was still da bomb!) and wondered why there hasn’t been a film made about HER. Heck, Mark Zuckerberg has had a movie made about him. Ms. Grier is just as much (if not more so) an American icon.
There are so many black women that deserve to get some shine…Read the article at the For Harriet website: http://www.forharriet.com/2013/06/11-black-women-whose-lives-deserve.html
There was mild controversy over folks attire/performances at the Chime for Change concert, this past weekend:
Some folks were upset, as the event was supposed to be about bringing light to women’s issues/empowerment. I have to admit I raised an eyebrow, once I saw the photos from the event. Obviously, as a feminist I think women should be allowed to wear what they want, but the photos did make me uncomfortable. Why? How could I speak on my discomfort of the outfits, without sounding judgmental?
As I scrolled the Internet (to gauge what other folks thought about the concert), I found two comments that articulated my concerns. The posts were in response to folks that had stated those who were critical of the clothes, were participating in patriarchy/oppressive behavior:
“Not that I agree with a single person up in that post, but there is something frustrating about…ugh, let me try to phrase this right.
It’s not that sexuality isn’t empowering. It’s just that empowerment always seems to be shown as sexually charged. Like every popular media representation of a strong woman is one who is clad in body-baring spandex and being overtly sexual as a sign of her strength. Yes, it’s a sign of empowerment, but why is it the only example of a strong woman that we really see?”–commenter #1
“I wouldn’t criticize these specific performers. I’d rather focus on how our society is only interested in hearing about women’s issues when the person delivering the message adheres to existing beauty standards.
Think about how readily men dismiss feminists as ugly, frigid bitches that are only feminists because no one wants to fuck them. So to be taken seriously, we still have to jump through hoops. That’s the bullshit, not Beyoncé’s costume.”–commenter #2
Yeah, what they said. I think commenter #1 summed up my mixed feelings about the clothing choices of the performers. The images of women celebrities today, tends to be oversexualized. It’s not that there is anything wrong with these women being sexy. But, is it they are being sexy because they truly want to be, or is it just another marketing ploy by the male-dominated entertainment industry? It becomes even more complex, when looking at black women celebrities. I believe there has been an effort to wipe out the black female soul singer. Adele can stay covered up and sing “soul” music, while our singers are being promoted as “naughty” pop stars.
Black female singers, like Janelle Monáe, India.Aire, etc., are usually not given the same platform, at events like Chime for Change. Is it because they don’t fit into the current standard of an “empowered” woman (sexy). Monáe usually stays in buttoned-up shirts/slacks (folks were “relieved” when she wore a dress in her latest video, why?) and Aire is a dark-skinned black woman with an Afrocentric style. Would (mainstream) folks be less willing to watch/hear them speak about women’s empowerment?
I have scrolled the Chime for Change website, and I am still not sure what it’s about. First of all, the whole thing was founded by Gucci. Gucci is a high-end store, where the average woman can’t afford to shop. There has also been concerns of sweatshop practices, of the business. All of the performers outfits were made by Gucci. What’s in it for Gucci? Is it an opportunity to peddle their overpriced wares to the masses?
Secondly, there are glamour shots of the three main supporters of the organization: Beyoncé Knowles-Carter, Frida Giannini(creative director of Gucci), and Salma Hayek Pinalut. Other celebrities faces fill the first page of the website. The women offer generic platitudes about girls/women needing equal access to education, healthcare, and wages. Okay, yes but how is this organization going to go about this? Which brings me to my last concern, how is the money being used?
Supposedly, this organization has already raised $4 million dollars. It will be interesting to see how it’s actually used to empower women. I mean for all we know, it could be going into Gucci’s pockets. Chime’s advisory board is filled with celebrities/established non-profits. Where are the grassroots, radical, local women activists? You know, the women doing the everyday work.
I know there are some folks thinking, stop being so cynical! But the Non-Profit Industrial Complex, is a real problem. It becomes even more troubling when celebrities jump on the bandwagon. Is it really about empowering disenfranchised women or is it just another opportunity to promote their music, clothes, brand, etc.
The singer is currently featured on the cover of Ms. Magazine:
I tend to have mixed emotions about Beyoncé. I will admit I am not a fan. I am a 70’s/80’s child. I grew up with singers like Stephanie Mills, Angela Winbush, Miki Howard, Phyllis Hyman, Regina Belle, Vesta, etc. When compared to these amazing (underrated/respected) women, Beyoncé’s singing style/music catalog, tends to be “okay” to me. However, she is an electrifying stage performer/entertainer.
I also respect that she has worked hard for her career. Recently, a blog asked should young people look to Beyoncé, as a role model. In some ways, I would say yes. She has shown that having goals/aspirations are important. She has shown that you must work hard and be dedicated, to get what you want. She has shown that you must demand respect (but I ain’t bowing down, cuz I ain’t a bitch 🙂 and be professional.
However, I would be hesitant to embrace her as a feminist. I find it interesting that so many other feminists (black/white), do. Yet, these same folks have had no qualms ripping women like Lil Kim, Foxy Brown, Khia, etc., to shreds. Is it because folks tend to view them as “ghetto girls,” without redeeming qualities? Is it because Beyoncé comes across as sweet/humble, even though she sings about the same things they do (money, status symbols, being “freaky” in bed, etc.). They have also shown that if you work hard and go for yours, you can achieve. Yet, no one praises their accomplishments. Lil Kim (especially) tends to be mocked and deconstructed about her plastic surgeries. But, Beyoncé has also altered her appearance for mainstream acceptance/male gaze (long blonde hair, breast implants, colored contacts, skin lightening, etc.)
It’s not surprising that Ms. Magazine would pick Beyoncé, as their rare black woman cover. She is non-threatening and reinforces white women’s superiority complex (e.g. white beauty standards). Don’t we all remember them making Michele Wallace, take out her braids for her cover shot? I think it would’ve been more powerful, if this new issue had Assata Shakur on the cover. Shakur was recently listed as one of the FBI’s most wanted terrorist.
Ironically, I believe Beyoncé and her husband’s trip to Cuba, helped to realign the target on Shakur’s back. In their quest to show off/sense of entitlement, I believe it forced President Obama’s hand. As the husband, rapped about getting clearance from the president. Of course, he was just bragging, but it made President Obama look bad. I think the president wanted to show republicans, that he’s tough on “crime.” We all know the president, tends to worry what these racists think about him (that’s a whole ‘nother post).
Speaking of the husband, he is another reason I don’t readily accept Beyoncé as a feminist. She married an unrepentant misogynistic, colorstruck man. If you don’t believe me, all you need to do is look at the man’s music catalog. I find it disturbing, he recently joined Beyoncé on stage, at the Chime for Change event. When has he stood for anything representing empowerment of women? I guess because he’s nice towards Beyoncé (his ideal of beauty)/has a new daughter, we are supposed to forget he has gotten rich off the degradation of black women/community?
I think Beyoncé peddles “soft feminism.” In other words, sure she will talk about women needing to be paid equally to men, how important it is to be independent, etc., but she doesn’t really challenge/reject the status quo. If anything, she accepts/feeds into it…
I don’t dislike Beyonce, I really don’t. I just don’t see all the supposed feminist stands she takes, as others do.
The activist/poet Maya Angelou is known for her famous quote, “When people show you who they are, believe them the first time.”
It means, when someone shows you their true colors, believe it. Don’t make excuses for them (or accept their excuses/apologies). Take it as a warning, that you now know who you are dealing with.
Self-preservation is always important in the face of oppression.
I have decided to start a new series, named after Ms. Angelou’s poignant quote. There are so many folks out there that are being abusive in their actions/language. Then they turn around and act like we didn’t see them do, what they just did!
I think black women (especially) tend to find ourselves on the receiving end of degrading situations. We are often forced to grin and bear it. When it’s a black celebrity doing it, we are told we are supposed to support them (cuz, ya know you don’t want to be seen as a crab in the barrel), even when they are throwing us under the bus. Oh, hell naw! Life is too short for that.
That’s why, I have decided to dedicate this first post to Mike Epps. Recently Epps, ranted about his daughter/ex-girlfriend, at one of his stand-up shows (personally, ole boy has never been funny to me). He stated that his visibly black looking daughter/ex-girlfriend, were jealous of his new “light-skinned/good-haired” children. HA, HA, HA! Hilarious, eh?
I guess it hasn’t dawned on him (that his daughter/ex-girlfriend probably hate his guts) because he cusses them out and refers to them as “bitches” that look like James Brown. A common assault on visibly looking black women, that we are “manly” evil bitches. What a jerk…